Jonathan, Sambo’s qualifications too weak to effect change – Fashola

Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State, yesterday, said
President Goodluck Jonathan’s and his Vice, Namadi Sambo’s high
academic qualifications have not reflected in the policies they
introduced since they assumed office, saying, “We need someone
who could address our challenges.”
Fashola, who made the statement at the All Progressives Party,
APC, rally held in Ikorodu, lamented that the country has failed to
progress despite their high academic qualifications.
“We prayed that if we have someone who has degree, he will be
able to develop the country. And when the current president, a
Ph.D holder, assumed office, we rejoiced that the country will
improve. Rather than implement policies that would improve the
standard of living of the citizens, we were having regression,”he
said. “Also, his Vice-President is an architect but he cannot
construct roads. But it is sad that a lawyer is the Commissioner
for Works in Edo State and he has constructed several roads. In
Ogun State, the Commissioner for Works is an architect and he
has built several roads.
“So, let’s ask Sambo, the Vice President what has he done for the
nation since he assumed office. All he (Sambo) could do was to
inform the President that people are leaving Lagos because of tax
regime. And I want everyone to ask the Vice President if the
number of vehicles coming into Lagos has reduced.”
Fashola noted that lack of governance experience exhibited by the
President and his Vice could also be seen in all the candidates
presented by the People’s Democratic Party, PDP, for the 2015
elections.
He said, “For instance, their governorship candidate in Lagos State,
Mr. Jimi Agbaje, is displaying his inexperience and ignorance on
government budget with his recent comment on budget allocation
for education in Lagos.”
Agbaje had at the third edition of the gubernatorial debate
organised by the Diocese of Lagos West, Anglican Communion
(Church of Nigeria), Ikeja said that state government spends three
percent of its budget on primary education.
He continued: “With this comment, he does not have knowledge on
finance issues. If he listened to my budget speech, I said that we
increased budget for education from 15 percent to 16.8 percent. I
also explained that the 16.8 percent is not the entire budget for
education.
But funds for some of the education programmes were left with
the ministry that was saddled with such responsibility in the state